Match Group Regulatory Developments

Investments
, ,
1

This topic discusses Match Group’s regulatory developments such as civil suits.

2

I=5
Six rape survivors sue Tinder and Hinge for accommodating known rapists

  • Six U.S. rape survivors have sued Tinder and Hinge for accommodating known rapists.
  • The women, who are backed by four law firms said the two platforms allowed known abusers such as Stephen Matthews to stay on the app.
  • The victims are seeking unspecified compensation from Match Group.
  • Legal experts said the suit faces an uphill battle against section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which grants online platforms immunity from liability for most user-generated content.
  • In 2019, Carrie Goldberg, one of the attorneys representing the victims lost a lawsuit against Grindr, with the court saying the app was immune from liability due to section 230.
3

I=6
Tinder agreed to settle 10-year age discrimination lawsuit for $60.5 million

  • The class-action settlement is expected to be approved by a California Court in May 2026.

  • Tinder had been accused of violating California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act and Unfair Competition Law which states that all persons under California jurisdiction are “entitled to full and equal accommodations in all business establishments.”

  • The lawsuit was brought 10 years ago.

    “After careful consideration, we determined that resolving this matter was the best path forward to remove uncertainty, reduce management distraction, and protect Tinder from financial risks associated with ongoing litigation. To be clear: this settlement is not an admission of guilt or liability. User trust remains foundational to our long-term success. We are committed to operating with transparency as we put this ten-year-old matter behind us and return our focus to executing on our mission," Tinder said in a statement.

Assessment

Unruh acts are currently the fiercest, hence it makes sense that Tinder had to part with $60.5 million.

In my opinion, $60.5 million settlement is a lot for Match Group given the current problems that Tinder is going through (i.e. declining users and app revamp costs). However, it may be the right move as it enables management to concentrate on what matters.

Bumble is facing a similar lawsuit that claims it discriminates against straight women. Hence this settlement raises the risk that Bumble may also settle for a higher amount. I expected a settlement of less than $10 million for Bumble given the launch of “opening moves” and the popularity of “women first message” in the past (i.e. number of straight women signing up for the class action lawsuit may be low) (Bumble legal disputes (Notion)). I will compare the Tinder and Bumble case to see if there will be worser outcome for Bumble.

Edit: The $60.5 million charge was already booked in Q3 2025 (10-Q page 36 and 52).

1 Like
4

I=6
Match Group is facing a proposed class action lawsuit following data breach last week

David Stevens alleged in a proposed class action filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas following data breach last week that Match Group breached its duties under common law, contract law, industry standards, and the Federal Trade Commission Act to implement reasonable and adequate data-security.

Assessment

Such lawsuits normally end up in settlements. The settlement amount normally depends on the number of plaintiffs.

Based on the fact that the hackers claim they stole 10 million of Match Group records and outcome of precedents (2026 data breach class action (Notion)), the settlement amount could be less than $10 million. However, monitoring how the class action lawsuit evolves remains important as the settlement amount could rise sharply if many plaintiffs come forward.